I began my
research looking for a way to better assess where my fourth graders are at
daily with math performance. I was
finding that waiting for the end of unit summative assessment was too late in
reaching my learners. I started
researching ways to monitor progress more often, and ways to change my
instruction to meet individual student needs.
My review of
literature brought me to many ideas that I can implement in my classroom. A list of these ideas are as follows: 1) using assessments as a tool for improving
teaching and learning, 2) assigning meaningful work, 3) using formative
assessments, and 4) improving teacher feedback. These ideas will help me greatly in knowing
daily where my students are performing. They will also help in changing my
instruction to guide them to the next level in learning.
My question is,
“How will using target-based instruction as formative assessment impact my
fourth grade math students’ performance?”
My plan is to write learning targets for each math unit and use a self-rating
scale of understanding to monitor progress toward the targets. I will also use exit slips daily for current
math topics and also previously taught math topics. My students will then self-rate their
understanding on a scale of 0 – 4 on a data sheet that I will provide. I will use daily exit slips, bi-weekly data
sheets, and observation of students to provide extra support and useful
feedback. This will help me know where
my students are at daily and it will shape my instruction daily.
Questions
1. Are formative assessments more valuable
than summative assessments?
2. Can learning targets and formative
assessments be useful in all subject areas?
3. Can students accurately rate their own
understanding or proficiency?
No comments:
Post a Comment